Smoking bans have
become increasingly strict and extensive in recent years. It has even been proposed that the freedom to smoke in public will be eradicated in the
not–too-distant future. This has led to concern amongst smokers
that these bans are personal attacks against them, with the intentions of
strengthening the divide between smokers and non-smokers. On the other hand, there has been
significantly less emphasis directed towards the positive motives of the
introduction of smoking bans, many of which are worth revisiting, including addressing
the risks of second-hand and third-hand smoke.
So just how harmful is
involuntary smoke exposure, also known as secondhand-smoke? The Center
for Disease Control and Prevention asked the Institute of Medicine to
investigate the relationships between second-hand smoke and cardiovascular disease as well as the relationship between smoking bans and heart attacks. To call the results eye-opening would
be an understatement:
· Study results consistently indicate that
exposure to secondhand smoke increases the risk of coronary heart disease by 25% - 30% (Institute of Medicine, 2009)
· All of the publications show a decrease in the
rate of heart attacks after a smoking ban was implemented, ranging from 6% to 47% depending on the study (Institute
of Medicine, 2009)
Third-hand smoke is
the residue from second-hand smoke absorbed by interior surfaces such as
floors, walls, furniture, and clothing.
Residents that combine with reactants in the air can produce dangerous products. Hugo Destaillats, a chemist at
Berkeley Laboratory demonstrated that residual nicotine can react nitrous acid to form tobacco-specific nitrosamines or TSNAs, which are among the most potent cancer causing agents present in unburned tobacco and tobacco smoke.
Gas appliances, which are widely prevalent in homes, are the main source of nitrous acid. Also, smoking outdoors or opening windows when smoking in the car does not address the dangers of third-hand smoke, as the smoke residues sticks strongly to clothing and countless surfaces found in homes and cars (engines in cars emit nitrous acid, and some enters the cabin). There are even indications that third-hand smoke poses the greatest risk to infants and toddlers.
Put aside the
anti-smoking ideology for a moment, and imagine that no one is against the act
of smoking. What about non-smokers
being exposed to second-hand smoke resulting in significantly increased risks
of cardiovascular disease? What about the infants and toddlers being exposed to
third-hand smoke and TSNAs? They are some of the reasons why smoking bans
should be depicted as harm-reduction measures rather than personal attacks on
smokers.
References:
Secondhand Smoke
Exposure and Cardiovascular Effects: Making Sense of the Evidence (2009). Washington:
National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/Secondhand-Smoke-Exposure-and-Cardiovascular-Effects-Making-Sense-of-the-Evidence/Secondhand%20Smoke%20%20Report%20Brief%203.pdf
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35318118/ns/health-addictions/t/third-hand-smoke-danger-babies-toddlers/